Bird's-eye view
Psalm 137 is a song of sorrow, defiance, and fierce loyalty. It is the anthem of the displaced, the lament of a people whose world has been shattered. The setting is the Babylonian exile, the covenant curse for generations of apostasy, and the emotional landscape is one of deep grief. But this is not a despairing grief. It is a grief animated by memory and resolve. The exiles remember Zion, the place of God's presence, and that memory makes their present circumstances unbearable. When their pagan captors demand to be entertained with the sacred songs of Israel, the psalmist responds with a question that is really a declaration of war: holy things are not for the amusement of the unholy. This psalm teaches us about the integrity of worship, the power of memory, and the non-negotiable antithesis between the city of God and the city of man.
The central conflict of the psalm is the refusal to perform. The Babylonians want a show; they want to domesticate the fierce religion of the Hebrews and turn it into a cultural artifact. The psalmist refuses. He understands that the songs of Zion are not mere folk tunes; they are expressions of covenant reality. To sing them in Babylon, at the behest of Babylon, would be to lie. It would be to pretend that God can be worshiped anywhere, under any circumstances, without regard to holiness and truth. This psalm is therefore a profound statement about the cost of discipleship and the necessity of refusing to compromise our worship for the sake of cultural acceptance.
Outline
- 1. The Grief of the Godly in Exile (Ps 137:1-4)
- a. Sorrow by the River (Ps 137:1)
- b. Silenced Instruments (Ps 137:2)
- c. The Taunting Demand (Ps 137:3)
- d. The Pious Refusal (Ps 137:4)
Context In Psalms
Psalm 137 is one of the most historically specific psalms in the entire Psalter. It is located squarely in the period of the Babylonian exile, following the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in 586 B.C. It is a communal lament, expressing the collective sorrow and anger of the captured people of Judah. The psalm is a raw and honest portrayal of the trauma of being ripped from the promised land, the place where God had placed His name. It sits within the broader collection of psalms that wrestle with God's judgment and the apparent triumph of the wicked. But it is not a psalm of doubt. It is a psalm of fierce, unyielding faith, a faith that remembers God's promises even when the present reality seems to contradict them. It is a necessary prelude to the psalms of restoration and praise that will follow, because true restoration can only begin after a full accounting of the loss.
Key Issues
- The Role of Memory in Faith
- The Nature of True Worship
- The Antithesis of Zion and Babylon
- Cultural Compromise
- Righteous Grief
- The Sacredness of God's Praise
No Songs for Pagans
There is a time to sing, and there is a time to hang up your harp. Wisdom is knowing the difference. The exiles in Babylon were not suffering from a loss of memory; they were suffering because of their memory. They remembered Zion, and that memory was a hot coal in their hearts. Their captors wanted to take that hot coal and turn it into a party trick, a little something to liven up a Babylonian afternoon. The request to "sing us one of the songs of Zion" was not an inquiry into their faith. It was a demand for entertainment. It was the world telling the church to perform, to put on a show, to make its holy things palatable and amusing for a pagan audience. The response of the psalmist is not one of sullenness, but of profound theological integrity. Our songs are not for you. Our worship is not a commodity. Our God is not your court jester.
Verse by Verse Commentary
1 By the rivers of Babylon, There we sat and also wept, When we remembered Zion.
The scene is set with deliberate contrast. The "rivers of Babylon," likely the Tigris, Euphrates, or one of their many canals, were the lifeblood of that pagan empire. They represented the power, wealth, and agricultural might of Israel's captors. And there, by the waters of the world's greatest power, the people of God sat down. This is not a posture of relaxation. It is the posture of mourning, of a shiva. They are sitting in the dust of their humiliation. And they wept. The tears are not just for their lost homes or their personal suffering, but for something far greater. The tears flow when they remembered Zion. Zion was not just a geographic location; it was the theological center of the universe, the city of the great King, the place of the temple where God had promised to dwell with His people. To remember Zion in the heart of Babylon was to remember heaven while sitting in hell. It was the memory of God's covenant presence that made the pain of their covenant-breaking exile so sharp.
2 Upon the willows in the midst of it We hung our lyres.
The lyre, or harp, was the instrument of praise, joy, and prophecy. David played the lyre to soothe Saul and to sing praises to God. The temple worship was filled with the music of lyres. To hang up the lyres was a potent symbolic act. It was a worship strike. It was a declaration that joy was impossible and praise was inappropriate in their current state. The music had stopped. This was not a sin; it was a righteous and sober recognition of their situation. They were under the judgment of God, and the appropriate response was not to pretend everything was fine. The willows, or poplars, were trees that grew by the water, but here they become hangers for silent instruments. The very creation that surrounded them in Babylon was made a witness to their sorrow and their refusal to engage in false, happy worship.
3 For there our captors asked us about the words of a song, And our tormentors asked joyfully, saying, “Sing for us one of the songs of Zion.”
Here the source of the conflict is made explicit. Their captors, the very ones who had dragged them from their homes and destroyed their city, now demand a song. The Hebrew indicates that they were demanding the very words of a song. They wanted the lyrics, the content of Israel's faith, served up for their amusement. Their tormentors ask for this with mirth, with joy. This is the ultimate insult. It is the demand that the holy suffering of God's people be turned into a floor show. They are not asking to convert; they are asking to be entertained. They want to hear the quaint religious tunes of their conquered subjects. This is the world's constant demand of the church: give us your culture, your ethics, your spiritual vibe, but do not dare bring your King or His exclusive claims. Sing us a song of Zion, but leave Zion's God out of it.
4 How can we sing a song of Yahweh In a foreign land?
This is the great question of the psalm, and it is a rhetorical one. The answer is, "We cannot, and we will not." The issue is not one of acoustics or ability. The issue is one of propriety and faithfulness. How can we sing a song that belongs to Yahweh, the covenant God of Israel, in a land that is defined by its opposition to Him? A "foreign land" here is not a neutral term; it means a pagan land, an unclean land, a land outside the boundaries of the covenant. The songs of Zion were part of the liturgical life of a holy people in a holy land, directed to a holy God. To sing them on demand for idolaters would be to profane them. It would be an act of deep spiritual treason. It would be like taking the bread and wine of communion and serving it as an appetizer at a drunken party. This refusal is an act of profound loyalty to God. It is a declaration that even in defeat and exile, Yahweh is still their God, and His worship will not be trivialized.
Application
We do not live in Babylon, but we do live in a foreign land. We live in a world that is increasingly hostile to the exclusive claims of Jesus Christ, but which is simultaneously fascinated by the trappings of Christianity. The world is constantly asking the church to sing one of the songs of Zion. It wants our Christmas carols in the mall, but not our Christ in the public square. It wants our moral principles for a stable society, but not the lawgiver who stands behind them. It wants the church to provide inspiration, entertainment, and therapeutic comfort, but it does not want to hear the song of the Lamb who was slain, the song of judgment and redemption.
This psalm calls us to a similar integrity. We must refuse to allow our worship to be co-opted and commodified by the world. Our worship is not a performance for the unregenerate. The gathering of the saints on the Lord's Day is not an evangelistic outreach designed to be as palatable as possible to unbelievers. It is a covenant renewal ceremony for the covenant people of God. We are there to do business with our holy God, not to put on a show for our pagan neighbors. When we are asked to sing the Lord's song in a strange land, we must have the courage to ask, "How can we?" This may mean refusing to offer a generic prayer at a civic event that dishonors Christ, or refusing to water down the gospel to make it less offensive. It means we remember Zion. We remember that we are citizens of a heavenly city, and our ultimate loyalty is to her King, not to the fleeting empires of this age. We hang up our harps when the world demands a performance, so that we can learn to sing the Lord's song in faithfulness, awaiting the day when we will sing it in His presence.