Bird's-eye view
In this passage, we have the third and final speech from Eliphaz the Temanite, and his patience has clearly worn thin. Having failed to extract a confession from Job with his previous arguments from visionary experience and tradition, he now resorts to blunt, baseless accusations. He prefaces his attack by constructing a caricature of Job’s theology, a straw man that is easy to knock down. He accuses Job of harboring a form of practical deism, suggesting that Job believes God is too high and mighty, too distant and detached in the heavens, to take any notice of human affairs on earth. Eliphaz paints a picture of a God who is insulated from the world by thick clouds, unable to see or judge the actions of men. This is not theology; it is slander. Eliphaz is putting words in Job’s mouth, attributing to him a wicked worldview in order to justify the conclusion he has already reached: that Job is a great sinner suffering for his specific, hidden transgressions. This passage is a master class in how to misuse orthodox statements about God’s transcendence to support an unrighteous judgment against a brother.
The central error here is a failure to hold two truths in tension. Yes, God is in the height of heaven, infinitely majestic and transcendent. But He is also immanent, intimately involved with His creation, and His eyes roam the whole earth. Eliphaz takes the truth of God’s loftiness and weaponizes it, twisting it into a charge of divine ignorance and indifference. He is setting the stage for his list of fabricated sins (vv. 5-9) by first establishing a motive for them. He is saying, "The only reason a man like you would act so wickedly is if you first believed you could get away with it." It is a classic example of what the counselors do throughout this book: they are right woodenly, applying a general principle with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer, and in the process, they malign both Job and the God they claim to defend.
Outline
- 1. The Accusation of Practical Deism (Job 22:12-14)
- a. A Right Premise: God's Heavenly Transcendence (Job 22:12)
- b. A False Conclusion: God's Supposed Ignorance (Job 22:13)
- c. A Slanderous Caricature: God Blinded by the Clouds (Job 22:14)
Context In Job
We are now deep into the third cycle of speeches. Job has steadfastly maintained his integrity, not in the sense of sinless perfection, but in the sense that he is not guilty of the kind of high-handed, covenant-breaking wickedness that would warrant his extreme suffering under the terms his friends have laid out. Job’s complaints have been raw and at times bordered on irreverent, but he has never once denied the existence or power of God. Rather, his entire crisis stems from the fact that he does believe in God's sovereignty and justice, and he cannot reconcile that belief with his experience. Eliphaz, along with Bildad and Zophar, operates on a rigid and simplistic theological system: God is just, therefore severe suffering is always and immediately the result of severe sin. Since Job is suffering severely, he must be a severe sinner. Because Job will not confess, Eliphaz abandons all pretense of comfort and launches a direct, brutal assault on Job’s character, beginning with this misrepresentation of his beliefs.
Key Issues
- God's Transcendence and Immanence
- The Sin of Bearing False Witness
- Caricaturing an Opponent's Position
- Right Doctrine Used for Wrong Ends
- Practical Atheism
The Slanderer's Straw Man
One of the most common and dishonest rhetorical tricks is to misrepresent your opponent's position in order to make it easier to attack. You build a man out of straw, knock it over, and declare victory. This is precisely what Eliphaz does here. He is not engaging with what Job has actually said. Job’s cry has been, “Where is God? I know He is just, so why can I not find Him to plead my case?” Eliphaz twists this into, “Job thinks God is stuck up in heaven and can’t see what’s going on.”
This is a profound spiritual danger for anyone who engages in theological debate. It is very easy to take a truth that your opponent holds, distort it slightly, and then beat him with it. Eliphaz is a model of how not to do theological triage. He hears Job’s anguish over God’s hiddenness and reframes it as a doctrinal deviation that makes Job sound like a fool from the Psalms who says in his heart, “There is no God.” He takes the truth of God’s majesty, a truth Job himself affirms, and presents it as a doctrine of divine incompetence. He is defending God, he thinks, but he is doing so with the devil’s own tactics: lies and slander. The lesson for us is plain. We must represent the positions of others, especially those with whom we disagree, with scrupulous fairness. To do otherwise is to follow in the footsteps of Job’s miserable comforters.
Verse by Verse Commentary
12 “Is not God in the height of heaven? Look also at the distant stars, how high they are!
Eliphaz begins with an unimpeachable statement, a basic tenet of orthodoxy. Of course God is in the height of heaven. His majesty and glory are far beyond our comprehension. The stars, which appear as tiny specks of light from our vantage point, are themselves immense, and God is far above them. This is the language of worship. The Psalms are filled with this kind of sentiment, celebrating the transcendence and creative power of God (Psalm 8:3-4, Psalm 113:5-6). On its own, this statement is perfectly true and good. But in the mouth of Eliphaz, this truth becomes the premise for a lie. He is not saying this to stir up wonder and awe. He is saying it to build a case. He is establishing God's remote location as a setup for his next point. This is what makes his counsel so insidious; it is truth laced with poison.
13 You say, ‘What does God know? Can He judge through the dense gloom?
Here is the pivot from truth to slander. Eliphaz puts words directly into Job’s mouth: "You say..." But Job has never said this. Not once. This is a complete fabrication. Eliphaz is claiming that Job takes the fact of God’s transcendence and draws a wicked, atheistic conclusion from it. The "dense gloom" or "dark cloud" (araphel in Hebrew) is a picture of obscurity. Eliphaz accuses Job of believing that the sheer distance and majesty of God create a kind of cosmic fog that prevents Him from seeing and judging accurately. He is accusing Job of believing in a God who is functionally blind. This is the ancient lie of the sinner who wants to believe his actions are unobserved. "The LORD does not see; the God of Jacob does not perceive" (Psalm 94:7). Eliphaz is charging Job with this very sin, without a shred of evidence.
14 Clouds are a hiding place for Him, so that He cannot see; And He walks on the vault of heaven.’
Eliphaz doubles down on his caricature. The clouds are not a majestic chariot for God (Psalm 104:3) but rather a hiding place, a celestial blindfold. God is portrayed as a distant landlord, pacing back and forth on the "vault of heaven," the dome of the sky, completely oblivious to the tenants down below. He is too occupied with His cosmic stroll to be bothered with the details of justice on earth. This is a picture of a detached, uninterested deity. It is the god of the deists, a god who wound up the clock and walked away. Eliphaz presents this pathetic idol and says to Job, "This is your god. This is the theology that allows you to live a secret life of sin." He has taken the glorious biblical imagery of God dwelling in unapproachable light, sometimes described as thick darkness or clouds (1 Kings 8:12), and twisted it into a statement about God's incompetence and ignorance. It is a damnable misuse of Scripture and a profound slander against a righteous man.
Application
The spirit of Eliphaz is alive and well in the church today. It is the spirit that is quick to judge the motives of others, to assume the worst, and to attribute wicked beliefs to those who are suffering or with whom we disagree. It is a temptation to take our theological systems, which may be largely correct, and apply them in a graceless, mechanical, and cruel way.
When we see a brother or sister in deep affliction, our first instinct must not be to search for the hidden sin. Our first instinct must be compassion, to weep with those who weep. Job’s friends failed because they came as prosecutors, not as friends. They valued their tidy theological system more than they valued the man sitting in front of them in agony.
Furthermore, we must be on guard against the practical atheism that Eliphaz falsely attributes to Job. It is one thing to confess that God is omniscient; it is another to live like it. How often do we sin with the assumption, however subconscious, that God is a long way off? We imagine a cloud between us and Him. We think our private thoughts, our internet browsing, our sharp words behind closed doors are somehow outside His jurisdiction. But the true God, the God of the Bible, is not the god of Eliphaz’s caricature. He is high and lifted up, yes, but He also fills heaven and earth. The darkness is as light to Him. There are no clouds thick enough to hide us from His sight. This is a terror to the unrepentant, but it is a profound comfort to the believer. The same God who sees every sin also sees every tear. He is not a distant landlord; He is our Father. He did not remain on the vault of heaven, but came down in the person of His Son, Jesus Christ, to walk among us and to bear our sins. The gospel is the ultimate refutation of Eliphaz's slander. God is not indifferent; He is intimately, sacrificially, and eternally involved.