Bird's-eye view
In this portion of Job, we are hearing from Zophar the Naamathite, one of Job’s three friends. We must remember the dramatic context here. These men are not inspired prophets delivering an oracle from on high. They are counselors, and in this case, they are miserable counselors. Their great error is not that they get the general principles of God’s moral government wrong, but that they misapply them so woodenly and cruelly to their friend Job. Zophar is painting a vivid picture of the wicked man, assuming all the while that Job is the man sitting for the portrait. He is not, but the portrait itself is nevertheless a masterful depiction of how sin operates.
Zophar describes the life cycle of sin in the life of the ungodly. It begins with a delectable sweetness, a secret pleasure to be savored. But this is a profound deception. The thing that is so delightful in the mouth becomes poison in the belly. The ill-gotten gain, the swallowed wealth, cannot be kept down. God Himself will see to its violent expulsion. The passage is a graphic sermon on the law of sowing and reaping. The man who sups with the devil on cobra’s eggs for breakfast will not be enjoying a peaceful digestion by lunchtime. The end of this man is ruin, dissatisfaction, and judgment, all because he forsook the fundamental law of creation: you cannot build a lasting house on a foundation of injustice and greed.
Outline
- 1. The Deceptive Sweetness of Sin (Job 20:12-13)
- a. Evil as a Secret Delicacy (v. 12)
- b. Savoring and Retaining Wickedness (v. 13)
- 2. The Inevitable, Poisonous Consequence (Job 20:14-16)
- a. The Sweetness Turns to Venom (v. 14)
- b. The Vomiting of Ill-Gotten Gain (v. 15)
- c. A Fatal Diet of Poison (v. 16)
- 3. The Forfeiture of True Blessing (Job 20:17-21)
- a. Blindness to Real Prosperity (v. 17)
- b. The Inability to Enjoy Stolen Wealth (v. 18)
- c. The Foundational Sin of Injustice (v. 19)
- d. The Insatiable Greed that Destroys (vv. 20-21)
Context In Job
Zophar’s speech in chapter 20 is his second and final contribution to the dialogue. He is responding to Job’s discourse in chapter 19, where Job, despite his anguish, makes his magnificent confession of faith: “For I know that my Redeemer lives” (Job 19:25). Zophar, it appears, is entirely unmoved by this. He is a man who deals in rigid, observable formulas: wickedness leads to suffering. Since Job is suffering, he must be wicked. He therefore doubles down, ignoring Job’s plea for pity and his declaration of faith, and instead launches into one of the most graphic descriptions of the wicked man’s fate in the entire book.
This passage is a classic statement of traditional wisdom, the kind you find throughout the Proverbs. The problem is not the theology itself, but its application. Zophar is a hammer, and he sees Job as a nail. He is correct that God’s universe has a moral grain, and those who go against it will get splinters. He is wrong to assume he can diagnose every splinter’s origin with simplistic certainty. His words, though true in the abstract, become a tool of affliction in this specific context because he lacks the humility to recognize that God’s ways are sometimes more mysterious than his tidy system allows.
Verse by Verse Commentary
v. 12 “Though evil is sweet in his mouth And he hides it under his tongue,
Zophar begins with a profound insight into the nature of temptation and sin. Sin’s initial appeal is never that of a bitter pill. It is offered as a sweet morsel, a delicacy. The image is that of a man savoring a fine piece of candy. He doesn’t just swallow it; he rolls it around, enjoying every last bit of flavor. He “hides it under his tongue,” which speaks of a secret, cherished pleasure. This is not a sin committed in a moment of unthinking passion; this is a calculated, treasured indulgence. He loves his sin. He cultivates it. It is his private joy, hidden from public view but intensely real to him. This is the universal hook of all sin, from the garden onward. The fruit is pleasing to the eye and desirable for gaining wisdom. The bait must be attractive, or the fish will not bite.
v. 13 Though he desires it and will not forsake it, And holds it to his palate,
Here, Zophar emphasizes the tenacity with which the wicked man clings to his sin. He “desires it and will not forsake it.” This is not a weakness he struggles against; it is a treasure he guards. The language points to a settled affection. His will is fully engaged. He spares it, he pampers it, he refuses to let it go. To forsake it would be like spitting out the most exquisite flavor imaginable. He “holds it to his palate,” the roof of his mouth, to prolong the pleasure. This is the picture of a man utterly captivated by his transgression. He has made a choice, and his choice is for the sweetness, however fleeting. He is not deceived in the sense of not knowing it is evil; he is deceived in thinking that he can control the consequences and keep the sweetness without the poison.
v. 14 Yet his food in his stomach is changed To the venom of cobras within him.
And here is the great reversal, the pivot on which the whole moral universe turns. The candy becomes poison. The process is described as a kind of metabolic alchemy of justice. The very thing he consumed for pleasure undergoes a transformation “in his stomach.” It doesn’t just pass through him; it changes its nature inside him. What was sweet on the tongue becomes the “venom of cobras” in his gut. This is not an external punishment, but an internal one. The sin itself carries the seeds of its own destruction. The pleasure corrupts from within. It is a perfect image: the thrill of the affair becomes the gall of bitterness and betrayal. The rush of the stolen money becomes the gnawing anxiety of being found out. Sin is a lie, and the lie is that you can have the sweetness without the serpent’s bite.
v. 15 He swallows up wealth, But will vomit it up; God will expel it from his belly.
Now Zophar moves from the general principle of evil to the specific sin of avarice. The wicked man is a glutton for riches. He “swallows up wealth.” He doesn’t earn it, he doesn’t steward it; he consumes it ravenously. But the digestive process of divine justice continues. That which was greedily swallowed cannot be kept down. He “will vomit it up.” This is a violent, involuntary, and shameful reversal. He will not have the option of making a dignified restitution. The disgorging will be forced upon him. And lest we think this is some impersonal karmic process, Zophar is explicit: “God will expel it from his belly.” The Lord Himself is the active agent who ensures that this ill-gotten gain is ejected. God’s holiness cannot stomach stolen prosperity in the belly of a wicked man.
v. 16 He sucks the poison of cobras; The viper’s tongue kills him.
Zophar returns to the poison imagery, intensifying it. The man thought he was sucking on a sweet lozenge, but in reality, he was sucking the “poison of cobras.” He was drinking his own death sentence and calling it refreshment. The end is not just sickness, but death. “The viper’s tongue kills him.” The thing he embraced for life and pleasure brings about his utter ruin. This is the wages of sin. The Bible is plain about this from one end to the other. The way of the transgressor is hard, and its final destination is death. The viper’s tongue is a picture of the lethal, final consequence that strikes swiftly and irrevocably.
v. 17 He does not look at the streams, The rivers flowing with honey and curds.
This is a crucial verse for understanding the tragedy of the wicked. His damnation is not just in what he gets (poison), but in what he misses. While he was fixated on his little piece of poisonous candy, he forfeited the true feast. “He does not look at the streams.” He is blind to the abundant, flowing blessings of God. Zophar uses classic biblical imagery for true prosperity: rivers of honey and curds (or butter). This speaks of a land of plenty, of God’s rich and ongoing provision. The wicked man, in his frantic pursuit of stolen wealth, misses the very thing he thinks he is after. He chases a mirage of prosperity and in so doing, turns his back on the genuine article. He settles for a mouthful of gravel when he could have had a banquet.
v. 18 He returns what he has attained And cannot swallow it; As to the wealth of his trading, He cannot even enjoy it.
This verse describes the profound frustration at the heart of a life built on sin. He is forced to give back his gain, “what he has attained,” and he “cannot swallow it.” The phrase means he cannot assimilate it, cannot make it a part of himself. It remains a foreign object that must be expelled. Even the wealth that comes from his “trading,” which might have a veneer of legitimacy, is tainted. The end result is that “he cannot even enjoy it.” What a miserable condition. To have everything you ever schemed for, and to derive no joy from it. This is the hollowness of materialism. Sin promises satisfaction but delivers only a restless craving for more, coupled with an inability to enjoy what one already possesses. It is the curse of Midas: everything he touches turns to gold, but he cannot eat.
v. 19 For he has crushed and forsaken the poor; He has seized a house which he has not built.
Here Zophar gets to the root of the man’s sin. Why does all his wealth turn to poison? Because it was gotten through injustice. This is the foundational charge. “He has crushed and forsaken the poor.” His prosperity was not built on diligent labor and fair dealing, but on oppression. He saw the poor not as neighbors to be helped but as resources to be exploited. He “seized a house which he has not built.” This is the sin of theft, of taking what belongs to another. God is the defender of the poor and the fatherless, and when a man builds his estate by crushing them, he is picking a fight with God Himself. No enterprise founded on such wickedness can ultimately stand.
v. 20 “Because he knew no ease within his belly, In his covetousness, he does not let anything escape.
The internal turmoil is connected directly to his insatiable greed. He “knew no ease within his belly.” This is the opposite of the peace and contentment that is the great gain of godliness. His gut is in a constant state of unrest, a churning sea of desire. Why? Because of his covetousness. He is driven by a lust for more that can never be satisfied. He “does not let anything escape.” He is a black hole of acquisition. Nothing is ever enough. This is the very nature of greed. It is a fire that says, “Give, give,” and is never quenched. Such a man cannot know peace because the idol he serves is fundamentally restless.
v. 21 Nothing remains for him to devour; Therefore his prosperity does not endure.
The end of this path is bleakly logical. The man whose entire life is defined by devouring eventually runs out of things to devour. “Nothing remains for him to devour.” He has consumed his relationships, his reputation, and his own soul. And because his prosperity was not built on the generative principle of godly stewardship but on the consumptive principle of greed, it cannot last. “Therefore his prosperity does not endure.” It is a flash flood, not a river. It is a bonfire, not a star. It rises quickly and vanishes just as fast, leaving nothing behind but ash and ruin. Zophar’s point is clear: a life built on the sweet poison of sin is, in the final analysis, a self-consuming artifact, destined for the ash heap of history.
Application
Zophar, for all his faults as a counselor to Job, is a first-rate preacher on the subject of sin’s consequences. We must take his words to heart, for they describe a pattern that is woven into the fabric of God’s world. Sin always masquerades as something sweet, something desirable. It promises freedom, pleasure, and gain. But it is a liar. The sweetness is temporary, but the poison is permanent, apart from the grace of God.
The application for us is straightforward. First, we must learn to be suspicious of sin’s advertising. When something forbidden looks sweet, we must remember this passage and know that there is venom in it. We must train our palates to desire the honey and curds of God’s kingdom, not the cheap candy of the world.
Second, we must see that injustice, particularly the oppression of the poor, is a sin that God takes very personally. A society, a business, or a life built on taking advantage of the vulnerable is a house built on sand, and a storm is coming. We are called to build, not to seize; to be generous, not to devour.
Finally, we must see that the only true and lasting satisfaction is found not in what we can swallow, but in what Christ has given. He drank the cup of God’s wrath, the ultimate poison, so that we might drink from the rivers of living water. The wicked man in this passage vomits up his stolen treasures because they are a foreign substance. But for the believer, Christ Himself is our treasure, and He dwells within us by His Spirit. The world’s prosperity does not endure, but he who does the will of God abides forever.