Bird's-eye view
Here in Deuteronomy, on the plains of Moab, Moses lays out the constitution for Israel's future life in the land. This particular section is remarkable for its foresight. God, through Moses, anticipates the day when the people will desire a king, and He makes provision for it. This is not a reluctant concession to a future sin, but rather a prophetic shaping of a future institution. God is not caught off guard by Israel's desire to be "like all the nations." Instead, He co-opts that desire and sanctifies it, placing His own strict limitations upon it. The law for the king is a master class in limited government, established centuries before the Magna Carta. The king is not to be an oriental despot, but a brother under the law. His power is circumscribed in three key areas that represent the perennial temptations of political power: military might (horses from Egypt), diplomatic entanglements (foreign wives), and economic avarice (silver and gold). The positive requirement is equally striking: the king is to be a student of God's law, personally transcribing it and reading it daily. This is God's blueprint for a constitutional monarchy, where the true monarch is God Himself, and the earthly king is His chief subject, bound by the same covenant as the humblest Israelite.
This passage ultimately points us to the true King, Jesus Christ. Every Israelite king who failed to keep these statutes, and they all did in some measure, was simply preparing the way for the one King who would fulfill them perfectly. Jesus did not multiply horses from Egypt but rode into Jerusalem on a donkey. He did not multiply wives but has one bride, the Church, for whom He gave His life. He did not grasp for silver and gold but emptied Himself, becoming poor for our sake. And He did not just read the law; He embodied it and fulfilled it. This passage, therefore, is not just ancient political theory; it is a profound prophecy of the nature of Christ's kingdom.
Outline
- 1. The King Under God's Law (Deut 17:14-20)
- a. The People's Desire and God's Prerogative (Deut 17:14-15)
- b. The Three Prohibitions: Guardrails for Governance (Deut 17:16-17)
- i. No Trust in Military Might (v. 16)
- ii. No Trust in Foreign Alliances (v. 17a)
- iii. No Trust in Personal Wealth (v. 17b)
- c. The One Positive Command: A King Under the Word (Deut 17:18-20)
- i. The Royal Scribe: Personal Transcription (v. 18)
- ii. The Lifelong Student: Daily Reading (v. 19)
- iii. The Humble Brother: The Purpose of the Law (v. 20)
Context In Deuteronomy
Deuteronomy is a series of farewell addresses from Moses to the generation of Israelites poised to enter the Promised Land. It is a renewal of the covenant made at Sinai. The book is structured like an ancient Near Eastern suzerainty treaty, where a great king (God) lays out the terms of the relationship with his vassal (Israel). Chapter 17 comes within a larger section dealing with the administration of justice and the establishment of proper authority in Israel (Deut 16:18-18:22). Moses has just laid out the process for dealing with capital cases and established the supreme court (Deut 17:8-13). It is natural, then, to move from the judicial authority to the executive. This "law of the king" is part of a larger constitutional framework that also includes instructions for priests and prophets. God is organizing His people as a holy nation, and He is providing for all the necessary offices of leadership, ensuring that each one is subordinate to His covenant law.
Key Issues
- The Nature of Biblical Government
- Limited Government vs. Tyranny
- The Relationship Between King and Law
- The Temptations of Power (Sex, Money, Military)
- The Failure of Israel's Kings (e.g., Solomon)
- Christ as the True and Ideal King
- General Equity and Political Application
A Constitution for the King
Modern man, when he thinks of law, often thinks of it as a restriction on freedom. And when he thinks of kingship, he thinks of absolute power. The Bible turns both of these notions on their head. Here, God institutes a form of government where the law is not a cage for the people but a leash for the king. The king is not the source of law; he is the lead subject of the law. This is a radical political statement. In the ancient world, kings like Pharaoh were considered gods; their word was law. But in Israel, the king is to be a man with a copy of the law at his side, constantly reminding him that he is under an authority greater than himself.
God is not anti-monarchy in principle. He is, after all, the great King. The problem arises when men want a king "like all the nations." That kind of king is a tyrant, a man who stands above the law. God's kind of king is a brother who kneels before the law. This entire passage is a preventative strike against tyranny. It sets up guardrails to protect the people from the predictable corruptions of power. And in doing so, it provides a timeless political lesson: true freedom is not found in lawlessness, but in being ruled by a righteous king who is himself joyfully submitted to a righteous law.
Verse by Verse Commentary
14 “When you enter the land which Yahweh your God gives you, and you possess it and live in it, and you say, ‘I will set a king over me like all the nations who are around me,’
Notice the sequence. First, God gives the land. Then, they possess it and settle in. Only after they are established does the thought of a king arise. This is not an immediate command but a future provision. God knows the hearts of His people. He knows that the stability of a commonwealth will eventually lead them to desire a visible, central authority figure. The desire itself, "I will set a king over me," is not condemned. What is problematic is the motivation: "like all the nations who are around me." This is the perennial temptation for God's people, to seek security and identity in the patterns of the world rather than in their unique calling as God's covenant nation. God will grant their request, but He will immediately redefine it on His own terms.
15 you shall surely set a king over you whom Yahweh your God chooses, one from among your brothers you shall set as king over yourselves; you may not put a foreigner over yourselves who is not your brother.
The people may say, "I will set a king," but God immediately clarifies who is actually in charge. "You shall surely set a king...whom Yahweh your God chooses." The people's role is to ratify God's choice, not to make an autonomous selection. This was fulfilled when God chose Saul, and then David. The king's authority is derivative, flowing from God. Furthermore, the king must be "one from among your brothers." He is not a member of a separate, elite ruling class. He is an Israelite, bound by the same covenant and accountable to the same God. This principle of brotherhood is a direct blow to tyranny. A king who remembers he is a brother to his people is less likely to become their oppressor. The prohibition against a foreigner is not about racial purity but covenantal integrity. The king had to be a member of the covenant community, one who knew and was bound by the law of Yahweh.
16 Moreover, he shall not multiply horses for himself, nor shall he cause the people to return to Egypt to multiply horses. Yahweh has said to you, ‘You shall never again return that way.’
Here we have the first of three great prohibitions. The king is not to build his security on military might. In the ancient world, horses, and particularly chariots, were the equivalent of tanks. They were the premier offensive weapon. And the best place to get them was Egypt. This prohibition works on two levels. First, it is a command to trust in God for military victory, not in advanced weaponry. The king is to be a dependent king. Second, it explicitly forbids re-establishing a relationship of dependence on Egypt, the very house of bondage from which God had delivered them. To "return that way" was not just a geographical move; it was a spiritual regression, a turning back to the world's way of power and security. It was a vote of no confidence in God. This is precisely where Solomon later went astray, multiplying horses and chariots from Egypt (1 Kings 10:28-29).
17 And he shall not multiply wives for himself, or else his heart will turn away; nor shall he greatly increase silver and gold for himself.
The second prohibition concerns foreign entanglements and sensual indulgence. Multiplying wives, particularly foreign princesses, was the standard way ancient kings sealed diplomatic and military alliances. Each wife represented a treaty with another nation. But God forbids this because, as He explicitly states, "his heart will turn away." These foreign wives would bring their foreign gods, and the king's spiritual fidelity would be compromised. This is not just a warning against lust, though it includes that; it is a warning against political pragmatism that compromises covenant faithfulness. Again, Solomon is the poster child for violating this command, with his 700 wives and 300 concubines who famously turned his heart away from Yahweh (1 Kings 11:1-4). The third prohibition, against multiplying silver and gold, is a check on royal avarice and the temptation to trust in wealth. A king obsessed with hoarding treasure will inevitably oppress his people through taxation and become self-reliant. The king is to be a steward, not a plutocrat.
18 “Now it will be when he sits on the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write for himself a copy of this law on a scroll in the presence of the Levitical priests.
Having laid out the negative restrictions, Moses now gives the one great positive command. This is the central duty of the Israelite king. Upon his coronation, his first official act is not to raise an army or levy a tax, but to engage in an act of profound submission. He must, with his own hand, write out a copy of "this law", likely the book of Deuteronomy itself. This is not to be delegated to a scribe. The physical act of writing would impress the words of the law upon his mind and heart. And he is to do this "in the presence of the Levitical priests," the official custodians of the law. This publicly demonstrates that his authority is subordinate to the authority of God's written Word.
19 And it shall be with him, and he shall read it all the days of his life, that he may learn to fear Yahweh his God, to carefully observe all the words of this law and these statutes,
The transcribed copy is not to be filed away in the royal archives. It is to be his constant companion, his daily devotional. He is to read it "all the days of his life." This is a lifelong discipline. The purpose is twofold. First, "that he may learn to fear Yahweh his God." The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and for a king, it is the only antidote to the intoxicating pride of power. Daily immersion in Scripture cultivates a right view of God's majesty and his own creatureliness. Second, this learning is not for mere academic knowledge, but for obedience: "to carefully observe all the words of this law." The king is to be the chief exemplar of covenant faithfulness in the nation.
20 that his heart may not be lifted up above his brothers and that he may not turn aside from the commandment, to the right or the left, so that he may prolong his days in his kingdom, he and his sons in the midst of Israel.
Here is the ultimate goal, the fruit of this discipline. The law is a guard against pride. Reading God's Word daily will prevent the king's heart from being "lifted up above his brothers." It reminds him that he is made of the same dust as his subjects and is accountable to the same Judge. It also ensures his stability in governance, that he does not "turn aside from the commandment." He is not to be a political innovator, veering to the right with oppressive legalism or to the left with licentious liberalism. He is to walk the straight path of God's law. The result is a blessing: a long and stable reign for him and his dynasty. Obedience to God's law is not just a moral requirement; it is the foundation of all political stability and prosperity.
Application
While we do not have a king in the same way ancient Israel did, this passage is brimming with application for us. First, it provides a template for all Christian leadership, whether in the home, the church, or the state. The leader is not above the law but is the first one under it. The temptations of power are still the same: the lust for military and political might, the allure of compromising alliances and sensual pleasure, and the greed for wealth. The antidote is also the same: a daily, humble submission to the written Word of God. Any leader who neglects his Bible will inevitably find his heart lifted up in pride.
Second, this gives us a framework for evaluating our civil magistrates. Do they see themselves as servants under God, or as autonomous rulers? Do they govern with humility, recognizing they are brothers to those they govern? Do they seek security in military budgets and foreign treaties, or do they acknowledge our dependence on God? We are not to look for a king "like all the nations," who promises secular salvation through political power. We are to pray for and support leaders who fear God and are guided by a transcendent moral law.
Finally, and most importantly, this passage makes us long for the true King. Every Israelite king failed, more or less spectacularly, to live up to this standard. Solomon, who started with such wisdom, became the chief violator of all three prohibitions. This consistent failure was meant to create a hunger in God's people for a different kind of king, a king who would not fail. Jesus Christ is that King. He is the brother who was not lifted up, but humbled Himself to the point of death. He is the King who had the law of God not just on a scroll beside Him, but written on His heart. He is the King who perfectly trusted His Father, eschewing the temptations of worldly power, pleasure, and wealth. Our ultimate political allegiance is to Him. And as we live as citizens of His kingdom, we are to model the principles of this passage, living as humble brothers and sisters under the good and perfect law of our great King.