Bird's-eye view
In this section of Numbers, we see Israel on the cusp of entering the land. Having been refused passage by Edom, they now approach the territory of the Amorites. This is not just a travel log; it is a critical moment of covenantal transition and confrontation. The generation that fell in the wilderness is gone, and a new generation is being taught by God what it means to possess the land He has promised. The encounters with Sihon and later Og are foundational precedents for the larger conquest of Canaan. God is demonstrating His power to His people, hardening the hearts of their enemies, and giving His people the land, piece by piece. This is not random violence; it is the execution of God's long-standing judicial sentence against the Amorites, whose iniquity is now full (Gen. 15:16). Israel acts as God's appointed executioner, and in so doing, they inherit the land. The passage is a stark reminder that God's promises are fulfilled through conflict, and that He is the one who gives the victory.
Outline
- 1. The Request for Passage (Num 21:21-22)
- a. Israel's Diplomatic Approach (v. 21)
- b. A Reasonable and Peaceful Proposal (v. 22)
- 2. The Rejection and Attack (Num 21:23)
- a. Sihon's Refusal (v. 23a)
- b. Sihon's Aggression (v. 23b)
- 3. The Conquest and Possession (Num 21:24-26)
- a. Israel's Decisive Victory (v. 24)
- b. Occupation of Amorite Cities (v. 25)
- c. Historical Note on Heshbon (v. 26)
- 4. The Proverb of Conquest (Num 21:27-30)
- a. A Taunt Song Quoted (v. 27)
- b. Recalling Sihon's Previous Conquest (v. 28-29)
- c. Celebrating Israel's Greater Victory (v. 30)
- 5. Settlement and Further Conquest (Num 21:31-32)
- a. Israel Dwells in the Land (v. 31)
- b. The Capture of Jazer (v. 32)
Commentary
21 Then Israel sent messengers to Sihon, king of the Amorites, saying,
Israel begins with a diplomatic overture. This is important. They do not presume upon their status as God's chosen people to simply run roughshod over everyone. They are following a protocol. This is a formal request from one nation to another. Notice that they are acting as a unified people, "Israel sent," under the leadership of Moses. They are approaching the king, the recognized authority. This is not a mob action, but a calculated, orderly progression toward the land God has promised them. God's people are to be orderly, not chaotic. They are to show respect for established authorities, even pagan ones, before the necessity of conflict arises.
22 “Let me pass through your land. We will not turn off into field or vineyard; we will not drink water from wells. We will go by the king’s highway until we have passed through your border.”
The request itself is eminently reasonable. They are asking for simple passage, not for settlement or resources. They promise to stick to the main road, the "king's highway," which was a public thoroughfare. They promise not to forage, not to take from the land, not to damage property ("field or vineyard"), and not even to take water from private wells. They are presenting themselves as peaceful travelers with no hostile intent. This offer serves a crucial theological purpose. It establishes the righteousness of Israel's cause. When Sihon refuses this reasonable request, his subsequent destruction is shown to be just. He is not attacked without cause; he is the aggressor who refuses a peaceful request and initiates hostilities.
23 But Sihon would not allow Israel to pass through his border. So Sihon gathered all his people and went out to meet Israel in the wilderness and came to Jahaz and fought against Israel.
Here is the pivot. Sihon's refusal is not passive. It is active and aggressive. He "would not allow" them to pass. But he does more than just refuse; he musters his entire army and marches out to confront Israel in the wilderness. He doesn't just guard his border; he goes out looking for a fight. Why? Deuteronomy 2:30 tells us that "the LORD your God hardened his spirit and made his heart obstinate, that he might give him into your hand." God is sovereign over the pride and foolishness of pagan kings. Sihon's arrogance and aggression are the very means by which God will deliver him and his land into the hands of Israel. He thinks he is defending his kingdom, but he is actually marching to his own divinely-appointed destruction.
24 Then Israel struck him with the edge of the sword and took possession of his land from the Arnon to the Jabbok, as far as the sons of Ammon; for the border of the sons of Ammon was Jazer.
The battle is decisive. Israel, the people who had been slaves in Egypt and had wandered in the wilderness, strike down a powerful Amorite king and his army. This is their first major military victory in the conquest. They don't just win a battle; they "took possession of his land." This is key. The land is the promise. God is beginning to fulfill His word to Abraham. The boundaries mentioned, from the Arnon to the Jabbok, are specific. This is real history, real geography. God's promises are not ethereal; they are earthy. The note about the border of Ammon is also significant. Israel does not take their land, because God had forbidden it (Deut. 2:19). Israel's conquest is not a free-for-all; it is a disciplined, divinely-directed campaign.
25 And Israel took all these cities, and Israel lived in all the cities of the Amorites, in Heshbon, and in all her towns.
Possession means settlement. They move in. The cities that were once centers of pagan power and idolatry now become the dwelling places of the people of God. This is a pattern we see throughout Scripture. God dispossesses the wicked and gives their inheritance to the righteous. The kingdom of God advances by displacing the kingdoms of darkness. Heshbon is mentioned specifically as the capital city, the center of Sihon's power. Taking the capital signifies the complete overthrow of the previous regime.
26 For Heshbon was the city of Sihon, king of the Amorites. Now it was he who had fought against the former king of Moab and had taken all his land out of his hand, as far as the Arnon.
This historical note is not incidental. It shows that Sihon himself was a conqueror. He had taken this land from Moab by force. This does two things. First, it undermines any claim Moab might have had to the land. Israel didn't take it from Moab; they took it from the Amorites who had taken it from Moab. Second, it shows the transient nature of earthly power. Sihon lived by the sword, and now he has perished by the sword. His kingdom, built on conquest, has now been conquered. There is an irony here that the subsequent proverb will highlight.
27 Therefore those who use proverbs say, “Come to Heshbon! Let it be built! So let the city of Sihon be established. 28 For a fire went forth from Heshbon, A flame from the town of Sihon; It devoured Ar of Moab, The dominant heights of the Arnon. 29 Woe to you, O Moab! You perish, O people of Chemosh! He has given his sons as fugitives, And his daughters into captivity, To an Amorite king, Sihon.
Here the narrative incorporates a piece of poetry, a taunt song. This was likely a well-known Amorite song celebrating Sihon's victory over Moab. It boasts of Heshbon's power, a "fire" and a "flame" that consumed Moab. It mocks Moab and their god, Chemosh, who was powerless to save his people from Sihon. The song celebrates Sihon's triumph. But now, in the mouth of Israel, this song takes on a profound irony. The very song that celebrated the establishment of Sihon's power is now being used to commemorate its utter destruction.
30 But we have cast them down, Heshbon perishes as far as Dibon, And we have made desolate even to Nophah, Which reaches to Medeba.”
This is Israel's addition to the song, or their repurposing of it. The "we" here is Israel. The Amorites who boasted of their victory over Moab have now been "cast down" themselves. The flame of Heshbon has been extinguished. The conqueror has been conquered by a greater power, the power of the God of Israel. The list of cities, Dibon, Nophah, Medeba, emphasizes the totality of the victory. The entire kingdom of Sihon has been laid waste. The taunt is turned back on the taunter. This is what God does. He takes the proud boasts of the wicked and turns them into a testimony of His own sovereign power.
31 Thus Israel lived in the land of the Amorites.
A simple, summary statement. The conflict is over, the victory is won, and the settlement is a reality. God has been faithful to His promise. Israel is beginning to inherit the land. This is a tangible, historical fulfillment of a covenant promise made centuries earlier. It is a down payment on the full inheritance that is to come.
32 And Moses sent to spy out Jazer, and they captured its towns and dispossessed the Amorites who were there.
The conquest continues. The victory over Sihon is not an isolated event but the beginning of a process. Moses, acting as the commander, sends out spies, this time with a very different result than the spies sent out a generation earlier at Kadesh Barnea. This generation has faith and courage, born from seeing God's power at work. They don't just spy; they capture the towns and dispossess the enemy. This is a mopping-up operation, securing the territory God has given them. It shows that the people are now acting in faith, taking the initiative to possess what God has granted them. The age of wandering and unbelief is over. The age of conquest and inheritance has begun.
Application
This historical account is pregnant with gospel truth. First, we see the principle of divine justice. The Amorites were not dispossessed on a whim. God's judgment against their sin, which had been accumulating for four hundred years, had finally come. In the same way, God's judgment against sin is real and certain. Without Christ, all men face a judgment far more terrible than what Sihon faced.
Second, we see the sovereignty of God over the affairs of men. God hardened Sihon's heart. He used the king's own pride and aggression as the instrument of his downfall. God is never a passive observer. He is actively working all things, even the sinful choices of wicked men, to accomplish His redemptive purposes. He does this to give His people their inheritance.
Third, we see that the path to the promised land runs straight through conflict. Israel had to fight. They could not receive their inheritance passively. In the same way, the Christian life is a warfare. We do not fight for our salvation, but because we are saved, we fight against the world, the flesh, and the devil. Our inheritance in Christ is secure, but we must "fight the good fight of faith" to lay hold of it in our experience.
Finally, the victory belongs to the Lord. Israel won, not because of their military might, but because God fought for them. The taunt song that once celebrated Sihon now celebrates the victory of Yahweh. Our victory in the Christian life is the same. We overcome, not in our own strength, but through the blood of the Lamb and the word of our testimony. Christ has already defeated our great enemies, sin, death, and Satan, and we walk in the reality of His victory. As Israel took possession of Heshbon, so we are called to take possession of the promises of God, dispossessing the idols in our own hearts and living as conquerors in the land Christ has won for us.